Cookies Inc. Secret Codes – All Hidden Codes & How to Redeem Them (2025)
You read a sentence back and something feels off. It is not exactly wrong, but it sounds soft, vague, or weirdly distant. That is often passive voice at work. It sneaks into emails, essays, blog posts, and captions because it sounds formal enough to pass at first glance.
Fixing passive voice is usually not hard. You just need to spot who is doing the action, move that person or thing to the front, and let the sentence breathe a little.
Passive voice happens when the subject of the sentence receives the action instead of doing it.
Example:
In the passive version, “the email” gets acted on. In the active version, “Mia” does the action. That is why active voice usually sounds clearer and more direct.
Passive voice is not evil. It just tends to do a few annoying things:
Compare these:
The second sentence is shorter, clearer, and more honest. That is usually the better choice.
Look for this pattern:
Examples:
Not every sentence with “was” or “is” is passive, so do not panic every time you see those words. The real question is this: is the subject doing the action, or receiving it?
Ask:
Who did the action?
If the answer comes after the verb, or is missing completely, the sentence is probably passive.
Example:
Who broke it? The sentence does not say. That is a strong clue.
Look for the person, group, or thing actually performing the action.
Passive:
Real doer:
Put the actor where readers expect it.
Once you rewrite the sentence, you can usually trim extra words too.
Passive:
Active:
That is cleaner already.
These are the kinds of rewrites that make the pattern click fast.
Passive voice is most annoying when it hides responsibility or slows the sentence down.
That second version sounds human. It also saves everyone time.
This is one of my biggest preferences as an editor. Blog writing should move. Passive voice often puts little speed bumps everywhere.
Not every passive sentence needs to be “fixed.” Sometimes it is the right call.
Use passive voice when:
Trying to eliminate every passive sentence usually makes writing worse, not better.
These show up a lot:
When you see one of those, stop for a second and ask whether the sentence would improve if the doer came first.
Some sentences use “be” plus another word and still are not passive in the way people mean.
Examples:
These are not passive voice problems. They are just linking verbs plus adjectives. Do not waste time “fixing” sentences that are already doing their job.
Passive:
Bad fix:
Better:
Do not replace one clunky sentence with another.
Passive:
Bad fix:
If you do not know who did it, and that detail does not matter, the passive sentence may be fine.
This happens a lot once people learn the rule. They start rewriting perfectly acceptable passive lines just to prove they can. That usually produces stiff, unnatural writing.
Before changing a sentence, ask:
If the answer to most of those points is yes, rewrite it.

Try these rewrites:
Better active versions:
That last example is a good reminder: sometimes active voice forces you to name a doer. Sometimes that helps. Sometimes it does not.
When you finish a draft, do one read-through looking only for these:
You will not catch every passive sentence that way, but you will catch a lot of them. Then check whether the sentence hides the actor or weakens the point.
That one pass can tighten an article faster than most people expect.
Passive voice is not automatically wrong. It just gets overused when writers want to sound formal, cautious, or polished. Most of the time, active voice sounds better because it puts the doer first and makes the sentence clearer.
So if a line feels foggy, do this: find the real actor, move them up front, and use a direct verb. If the rewrite sounds stronger, keep it. If the passive version serves the sentence better, leave it alone. That is the real goal. Not perfect grammar theater. Just cleaner writing.