• MISC
21 Errors Editors Hate and Ways to Fix Them

21 Errors Editors Hate and Ways to Fix Them

You send off a draft feeling pretty good, then it comes back looking like it lost a fight with Track Changes. That usually does not happen because the idea was bad. It happens because a handful of annoying, fixable mistakes made the piece harder to read than it needed to be.

Editors do not hate writers. They hate friction. They hate anything that slows the reader down, muddies a sentence, or makes clean copy take twice as long to polish. These are the errors that get circled over and over, plus the quickest ways to catch them before someone else has to.

1. Typos that should have been caught

Nothing tanks confidence faster than a headline typo or a misspelled word in the first paragraph. One typo will not ruin a strong piece, but a cluster of them makes the whole draft feel rushed.

Quick fix:
Read once for meaning, then once only for spelling. Slow down enough to notice each word. Reading aloud helps because your eyes skip what your brain expects to see.

2. Confused words like “your” and “you’re”

Editors see this constantly because spellcheck often lets it slide. Same with “their,” “there,” and “they’re,” or “affect” and “effect.”

Quick fix:
Search your draft for the usual suspects:

  • your / you’re
  • their / there / they’re
  • its / it’s
  • affect / effect
  • then / than

If a sentence still feels slippery, rewrite it instead of forcing the right choice into a weak structure.

3. Apostrophe mistakes

Editors have almost no patience for rogue apostrophes because they are so visible.

Common messes:

  • its instead of it’s
  • writer’s when you mean writers
  • 1990’s when you mean 1990s

Quick fix:
Use an apostrophe for possession or contractions. Skip it for plain plurals.

  • The editor’s note
  • It’s ready now
  • Three editors
  • The 1990s

4. Run-on sentences

A run-on is not just a long sentence. It is a sentence trying to do too much without the right structure.

Example:
The article was strong it just needed a cleaner ending.

Quick fix:
Split it, add a conjunction, or use punctuation that actually fits.

  • The article was strong, but it needed a cleaner ending.
  • The article was strong. It just needed a cleaner ending.

5. Sentence fragments that look complete at first glance

Fragments sneak in when you draft fast. They often look stylish in isolation, especially in digital writing, but too many make the copy feel choppy.

Example:

  • Because the deadline moved up.
  • Which made the whole argument harder to follow.

Quick fix:
Ask one question: can this stand alone as a full sentence? If not, attach it to the sentence around it.

6. Subject-verb agreement problems

This is the kind of mistake readers may not name, but they still feel it. A sentence sounds off even if nobody stops to explain why.

Example:
The list of mistakes are easy to fix.

Quick fix:
Match the verb to the true subject, not the noun sitting closest to it.

  • The list of mistakes is easy to fix.

7. Unclear pronouns

Editors hate making guesses. If “it,” “they,” “this,” or “that” could point to more than one thing, the sentence needs work.

Example:
The editor reviewed the article with the writer, and then they changed it.

Who changed what? Nobody knows.

Quick fix:
Replace the pronoun with the actual noun when the meaning is even slightly fuzzy.

  • The editor reviewed the article with the writer, and the writer revised the ending.

8. Comma chaos

Some writers scatter commas everywhere. Others act like commas cost money. Both are hard to edit.

Quick fix:
Use commas where they help the reader separate ideas, not where you happened to pause while typing. If you are inserting commas by instinct every five words, that is usually a bad sign.

9. Repetition no one noticed during drafting

Writers repeat words when they are moving fast. Editors notice because repeated wording creates drag.

Example:
This guide is helpful because it gives helpful tips in a helpful format.

Quick fix:
Search for repeated words, especially in the same paragraph. If a word appears twice in one sentence, there is a good chance one of them can go.

10. Weak openings

Editors get annoyed when the start of a sentence or paragraph wastes time.

Examples:

  • There are many reasons why this matters.
  • It is important to note that editing takes time.

Quick fix:
Cut the runway and land the point faster.

  • Editing takes time.
  • This matters because the error changes the meaning.

11. Overexplaining easy points

A lot of drafts say the same thing three times in slightly different ways. Writers do this because they are thinking on the page. Editors have to cut it back to one clear statement.

Quick fix:
If three sentences make the same point, keep the sharpest one and cut the rest.

12. Vague word choices

Words like “thing,” “stuff,” “nice,” “good,” or “bad” leave too much work for the reader.

Example:
The article had some bad stuff in it.

Quick fix:
Name the problem.

  • The article had repetitive phrasing and weak transitions.

Specific writing feels more confident because it is.

13. Inconsistent capitalization

This shows up more than people think, especially in blog drafts, product names, headings, and branded terms.

Examples:

  • Editor in Chief in one section, editor in chief in another
  • Internet in one paragraph, internet in the next
  • Website and web site both appearing in the same piece

Quick fix:
Choose a style and stick to it. A draft does not have to match every newsroom in the world. It just has to be internally consistent.

14. Tense shifts

A piece starts in past tense, slips into present, then swerves back again. Editors catch this immediately because it makes the timeline feel unstable.

Example:
She opened the document, reads the note, and sighed.

Quick fix:
Pick the tense that fits the piece and do one full pass just for verb consistency.

  • She opened the document, read the note, and sighed.

15. Bad headlines and lazy subheads

Editors hate having to rescue a draft whose headline says nothing useful. The same goes for vague subheads like “Things to Know” or “More Information.”

Quick fix:
Make headings do real work. A good subhead tells the reader what is coming next, not just that something is coming next.

Better:

  • Common Apostrophe Mistakes
  • Why This Sentence Sounds Wrong
  • How to Cut Wordiness Fast

16. Quotes that are dropped in without context

A quote is not automatically strong just because it is in quotation marks. Editors often have to clean up quote placement so it does not feel random.

Quick fix:
Set up the quote, use only what matters, and explain why it belongs there.

Weak:

  • “Editing matters,” she said.

Stronger:

  • She put it plainly: “Editing matters because readers notice confusion before they notice style.”

17. Clunky transitions

A lot of drafts move from point to point like someone changing lanes without signaling. The facts may be fine, but the flow feels abrupt.

Quick fix:
Add a bridge only where one is needed. Often one clean sentence is enough.

  • The grammar was correct. The tone was the real problem.
  • The intro worked. The ending needed more weight.

Transitions do not need to sound fancy. They just need to help the reader follow the turn.

18. Inconsistent formatting

This one drives editors up the wall because it creates cleanup work that has nothing to do with the quality of the ideas.

Examples:

  • one bullet ends with a period, the next does not
  • some subheads use title case, some do not
  • one list uses numbers, another uses dashes for no clear reason

Quick fix:
Do one final formatting pass after the writing pass. Treat structure like part of the writing, because readers absolutely notice when it feels messy.

19. Bloated sentences

Writers often bury good ideas under extra words.

Example:
Due to the fact that the deadline had been moved earlier than expected, the team was unable to complete the revision process in time.

Quick fix:
Cut the padding.

  • Because the deadline moved up, the team could not finish the revision in time.

My rule here is blunt: if a sentence sounds like it is trying to impress somebody, it probably needs trimming.

20. Cliches that flatten the writing

Editors see worn-out phrases so often that they stop carrying any force at all.

Examples:

  • think outside the box
  • at the end of the day
  • every cloud has a silver lining
  • in this day and age

Quick fix:
Say the point in plain language. Fresh writing does not have to be flashy. It just has to sound like a person meant it.

21. Submitting without a final read in context

This is the mistake behind a lot of the others. Writers check sentences one by one, but they never read the piece straight through as a reader would.

Quick fix:
Before you send anything, do one last pass for flow only. Check:

  • Does the headline match the article?
  • Does the intro earn the rest of the piece?
  • Do the subheads appear in a logical order?
  • Does the ending feel finished, not abandoned?
  • Are there any lines you would cut if this were someone else’s draft?

That final pass catches more than people think.

A fast self-edit routine that actually works

If you are editing your own work, do not try to fix everything at once. That is how obvious mistakes survive. Break it into passes.

First pass: structure

Check:

  • headline
  • intro
  • subheads
  • order of ideas
  • ending

Second pass: sentence clarity

Check:

  • run-ons
  • fragments
  • repetition
  • vague pronouns
  • bloated lines

Third pass: grammar and polish

Check:

  • typos
  • apostrophes
  • confused words
  • capitalization
  • formatting

This takes less time than sending out a messy draft and having someone else untangle it.

Serena River